Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Ojaste,James [NCR]" <James.Ojaste@**.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: Summer Time
Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 13:53:11 -0400
Sommers wrote:
>>[BTech snipped - I don't know anything about it]
>>>2: Back on Topic (well at least back on Shadowrun) could someone tell me
>>>what the speed of sound is at sea level in SR speed. this one's because
>>
>>About 300 m/s or 1000 km/h which in SR would be 1000/1.2 ~= 900
>>
>>>I think I've designed a Motorbike that could excede it. I don't have
>>>the stats here so you'll have to wait until after the Weekend until you
>>>see them (assuming you want to that is )
>>
>>Yeah?
>>*whips out The Shop, fiddles for a moment*
[snip]
>>Cruising Speed of 543, Top Speed of 815, with Nitrous you can get 1358.
>>
>>Not too shabby... :-)
>
>No bike so far has done it. There was an attempt a few months ago to be the
>first CAR to go over Mach1. IIRC the British team beat the US to the record
>by about 3 days out on the Salt Flats. Even then it was pretty iffy whether
>they could do it. And they were powered by jet turbines from the SR 71 I
>think. There were definitely a few spectaular crashes, because handling
>absolutely sucked.

It's a pretty crazy thing to try.

>I think the bike is a case where the rules say you can do it, but GM common
>sense should limit it. Think how much force you have pushing against a bike
>doing 150kmh. Now multiply by almost 7? The minute you tried to turn at
>all, you would become a fine red paint on the pavement.

I think that was the point of the original post... On the other hand,
take a look at all the other things that people can do in SR that are
basically impossible in RL. SR isn't realistic. Also, I've never
ridden a motorcycle, let alone at 150km/h, so I don't know how much
force there is - it would depend a great deal on how much of a profile
you're presenting to the wind, though.

>That does bring up at interesting point. I don't remember, but is there a
>Handling penalty for getting up in the higher speeds? Seems there should
>be, because of braking distance, turning radius, etc.

Yeah, the GM should be giving the nutcase a penalty of something like
+24 for trying that... Anybody remember the house rule we came up
with for handling at various speeds?

James Ojaste

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.