Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Cobra <wgallas@*****.FR>
Subject: Re: Giving blood in 205X: common or rare?
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:12:16 +0200
>> That's fine but we could add some points :
>> 1/ It's always less costly when people give their blood than when you have
>> to clone it.
>> 2/ I don't think people bother about giving their blood, even in SR. Most
>> joe citizens don't know anything about rituals, blood magic and other
>> things like this.
>> 3/ A good plot would be for an institute to use rituals on the custommers
>> who gave them some blodd. Perhaps they could develop a way to cast a ritual
>> on multiple targets and influence them to buy some products.
>
>The Red Cross tries to maintain a bit of identity-protection with blood
>donors now; maybe in the future they'd use a Mass Sterilize spell. Be
>sort of a pain to try a ritual only you ended up nabbing the wrong bag
>from the Red Cross (er - DocWagon) vaults. Especially if you wanted to
>screw your target over in a highly noticeable fashion.

And if Doc Wagon was the one who did it ?...
They couldn't make big use of these rituals because they would be noticed
and would suffer from a loss of profit. But if they only influence the
products you buy, this wouldn't be so obvious.

The sterilize spell awakens some questions :
1/ Is the blood (we'll consider in the same group) of a mundane the same as
an awakened ?
2/ If so, would a sterilize spell modify the sample in a way that it no
longer works with a mage ?
3/ Did anyone ever think about the proportion of mages at DocWagon. I
always wondered why there's no price for magical healing in SR2 or NAGtRL.
Typically, I would apply a multiplier of... Let's say 5 or 10.

- Cobra.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.