Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Cobra <wgallas@*****.FR>
Subject: Re: More thoughts about clones and magic
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 17:19:15 +0200
> Last night I posted an idea about a teleport spell using
> clones, and that lead me to think about something else. You
> can use DNA like a blood sample, skin, or hair as a ritual
> link. Now what if the target of the ritual has a clone? Since
> this clone's DNA is an exact replica of the target's, what
> happens to the ritual spell? Does it affect the target, the
> clone, or both simultaneously?

IMO, DNA is distinct from aura. And a spell uses aura synchronization to
get its effect done. So, the target is the one from which you took the sample.
Please remember that a clone is only a subject with the DNA as you. I don't
think DNA is the only thing that makes us who we are...

> Let's say it's the latter (which is the result I am leaning
> toward); consider this. Let's say a mage wants to take out a
> large group of people in one fell swoop (like a rioting mob,
> or an enemy army). Insert a group of clones (all alike) into
> the mob at spaced intervals. The mage then casts a ritual into
> the target; one of the clones, or the original. The spell will
> ground out through all the clones. If an area effect physical
> spell was cast, a very large area could be covered. The clones
> would probably get wasted, but so would a lot of people in the
> target area.
> What do you think? Feasible, whacked-out, or just plain silly?

Nope IMO (see above). Anyway, you have more easier way to handle that :
1/ Cast a big spell. You increase the radius by 2 meters for each die. You
can also use fetish foci to increase the pool (it's to you if it also
increases the range). If you cast it during a ritual, you will add the
different pools together.
2/ If you allow a ritual to be targeted at many targets by using multiple
samples (this isn't SR canon and I would use multiple targets rule as a
GM), you could have the same kind of result.

- Cobra.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.