Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Skillz to pay the billz
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:46:16 -0500
On Tue, 19 May 1998 10:36:46 +0100 Gurth <gurth@******.NL> writes:
>Erik Jameson said on 20:01/18 May 98...
>> This opens up a gripe I know some people have with the SR skill
>system.
>[snip gripe]
>
>IMHO an easy fix is to _require_ concentrations, rather than have them
>available as options to players. However in that case I think the +1
bonus
>should be removed, and only a +1 added for specializing. Taking this a
>step further, if someone wants to have the basic skill, you could
subtract
>a point.
>
>For example, spending 4 skillpoints on Computer (Software) means you get
a
>level of 4 in this concentration; 4 points on Computer (Software, Matrix
>Programming) gives a skill level of 5, while just Computer skill with 4
>points spent gives a skill of 3.
>
>At any rate it means characters will be good at the thing they
>concentrated in (for example, Athletics (Climbing)) but less about
related
>areas (running, jumping, lifting, etc.).
>
>--
>Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html -
<SNIP>

I want to make sure I've got this right ...

Bob spends 4 "points" nprmally, he could get:
Computer at 4;
Computer at 3, Software at 5; or
Computer at 2, Software at 4, Matrix Software at 6.

With your system Bob could get:
Computer at 3;
Computer at 2, Software at 4; or
Computer at 1, Software at 3, Matrix Software at 5.

right?
BTW, what happens if Concentration or Specialization would reduce the
general skill to 0? (ie Bob spends 2 "points" in firearms and
specializes in Colt Manhunter... would he have [Using the standard
system, not Gurth's] a firearms general skill of 1 or 0?)

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum)

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.