Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Petrolias on the map
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 19:11:19 EDT
In a message dated 5/20/98 4:30:40 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
aaa302@*****.ULAVAL.CA writes:

> Thanks for such a complete and knowledgeable answer, -K! :-)

NO Prob... :)

> Now that we know the "how?", let's study the "why?"...

Okay, Let's, this might help us here decide the course of the game..

> Why would Dunkie give exploitation rights to an Island to Federated-Boeing?
>
> answers:
>
> - Reinforce the fledgling Pacific Rim Co-prosperity group, soon to be
joined
> by Federated-Boeing? (note: i don't have the BitB book nearby, so i'm not
> sure about the name, but I mean the group of second-rate corps that are
> forming a group around Wuxing to better compete with the other Big 10
> corps);

Name is "Pacific Prosperity Group" btw. Federated Boeing hasn't made a
decision, as per the BitB text. However, it could swing either way what
effects this would have. Depending upon what exactly is unearthed
(literally), this could become a very nasty place. Formerly rare
minerals/materials might literally flow up, especially if a thermal vein is
disturbed beneath the strata in that vicinity.

There is also something about a "vaccine" that is required to all kids born
after that time period, so I am loathe to consider what else is going to be
spewing up into the atmosphere (as if Mankind hadn't fu@*** things up enough).

Also, if particularly useful materials (say, component elements to airplane
alloys and/or other composities) were found, then Federated Boeing would be
effectively be given a massive level of resources to draw upon for a lot of
their toys.

> - To spite Mitsuhama?

Well, yeah, he could have wanted to do that too... ;)

> - To help someone in Federated-Boeing, or Federated-Boeing (the simplest
> answer)?

Oh yeah, this is definitely a thing. Big D seems to have had a very large,
but very personable, agenda he wanted to maintain, even after his death.

> what do you think?

I think we aren't going to get any major answers of this type until the new
"Corporate Rundown" (or whatever the name is) comes out.

-K

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.