Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Weird Campaigns
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 10:36:52 +0100
DisnyShamn said on 20:14/20 May 98...

> I seem to recall a reference in VR2 to systems remaining "alert" for awhile
> after a decker has logged off. This would necessitate some sort of globalness
> of security tally. I'd suggest a compromise;
[snip]

Partly related to this, I thought about security tallies about a week ago,
and it suddenly dawned on me that it should be possible to erase or
inflate them... After all, it's just data kept on a computer somewhere, so
the decker should be able to in- or decrease the counter. However, looking
through VR 2.0 I couldn't find a system operation that allows this...

The way to go about this would, I guess, be to do a Locate File to find
the file (or memory address) containing the security tallies, and then an
Edit File operation to change them. If you do a Validate Passcode or
Invalidate Passcode before this, you should be able to erase your security
tally and appear a completely legitimate user, or do the opposite for
security deckers.

However, I think there'd be some protection built into the system, for
example that only supervisor-level users can alter security tallies. Any
thoughts?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
En ik zal het heen twee keer zehhen.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.