Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Airwasp <Airwasp@***.COM>
Subject: Re: EW-209 (was : Aztec Armored Troopers)
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 23:00:52 EDT
In a message dated 5/22/98 12:22:12 AM !!!First Boot!!!,
9604801@********.AC.NZ writes:

> Thanks for the proposal, Airwasp (0714 22-5-98 NZT):
>
> <<SLICE>>
> >Lone Star EW-209
> <<SLICE>>
> >Handling Speed Accel Body Armor Sig
> >4/2 25 7 2 12
> 3
> >
> >Autonav Pilot Sensors Cargo Load
> >NA 3 5 0 600 kg
>
> B/A 2/12? Armour's okay, but like Erik said, a Body of 2 is a little
> soft for proper combat ops. I had something more along the lines of 8/12
> in mind - bounce the pistols and rifles, absorb the machine-gun fire and
> any light anti-tank fire. (I took the approach that this would be used
> against fortifications (dug in infantry or in buildings) with few
> anti-tank weapons, or in true 'urban pacification' ops (house-to-house
> fighting and operations in high-value security zones).

Umm, but using the R2 rules, this is what I came closest to ED-209. Besides,
in R2, a Body 8 vehicle weighs in at around 31-45 tons. A Body of 2, still
somewhat lame anyway, weighs in between 26 - 199 kilograms.

> <<SLICE>>
> >Fuel : Diesel (55 liters)
> >Point Value : 2,989
> >Template :Crawler (Tracked), Large (Military)
>
> Probably the wiser choice, given the likely conditions in the
> area-of-operations, but still... the classic ED-209((tm)) image is a
> little more dramatic than the 'rolling drone' approach.

Yeah, but I would not have been able to get the heavy weapon on the damn thing
had I stuck to something that looked like a walker or anthroform. And I have
yet to finish all of the new power plants I am about to add onto Hoosier
Hacker House.

> <<SLICE>>
> >Anti-Theft VI + Self-Destruct (blows self up only)
> >Armor, Standard (12)
> >Drive-By-Wire I
> >Gunnery Control System (modified Sentry Gun System)
> > Intelligence = 11
> > Gunnery = 10
> > Initiative = 25 + 2d6
> >
> ><<<<<[Okay, guess what ? The boys from Houston came up with
something
> new for
> >us to fear now. This sentry gun system, if it looses communication or
> is
> >commanded to do so, will open fire on whatever it can "see" if the
> pilot is
> >compromised or the thing won't move anymore. Supposedly this thing
> can also
> >be commanded to do this also, I've heard someone call this "Schizoid
> >Mode."]>>>>>
>
> Oh, man. Now *that* is evil. Even if you cack the pilot, the guns'll
> still exact payback? Ouch.

Yup ...

> >Improved Off-Road Handling +2
> >Remote Control Interface
> >Rigger Adaption
> >Roll Bars
> >Small Remote AA Turret (Smartlink II Integration, Recoil Adjusters (9))
> >
> ><<<<<[Guys, this puts the thing in the MILITARY category of
weaponry.
> When
> >you can stick something like a small turret on an almost standard
> tracked
> >drone all frag is gonna break loose]>>>>>
>
> <<SLICE>>
> >Weapon Systems
> >Vengeance MMG + 300 rounds Standard Vehicular ammunition
> >Top-Mount MGL-6 Grenade Launch Pistol + 6 Concussion Grenades (or
> whatever
> >else you may choose)
>
> Nice, and scary, but for the sort of feel I want, not scary *enough*.
> Okay, my turn for invention (free-form; I have *no* idea how the design
> system works):

Get your hands on a Rigger2 then ... it would help some, otherwise, you would
be guessing using the old system from the RBB ...

Though what I will try and do is see if I can convert this into something as
if it were designed from the R2 ... I'll post this later also.

> Aztechnology 'Crusher'

<snip>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.