Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Waffelmeisters <evamarie@**********.NET>
Subject: Re: Multi-target rituals
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 14:53:47 -0500
>
> Re: Multi-target rituals (was Re: Giving blood in 205X: common or (Ereskanti , Sat
18:34)
>
> In a message dated 5/23/98 6:31:38 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> evamarie@**********.NET writes:
>
> > Yes, I was allowing an (non cannon) possibility that these tests
> > could
> > be done all at the same time, by splitting the ritual pool among
> > samples. I can't grasp your "flat rate of succeses"- I never used
that
> > phrase, and don't see how I implied it would happen, or even what it
> > means in this context..
> >
> by "Flat Rate", I was referring to what happens when you use a
"Mob"
> (Mentality) spell upon a crowd of generic NPC's. There is a given level of
> influence/alteration that occurs as an "average" to make the game mechanics
> move along better. I was just keeping things straight.
>

Ah, I see. Iwas actually thinking this wouldbecoolto do as a"group
blessing" or something like that, which would mean you'd have varied
targets, most likely.

> And btw, with the "allocating dice", they refer to each stage of the
ritual,
> NOT each target, as most of the time, there are simply no such instances of
> "Multi-Target rituals" that are come across in the books.
>
> -K

Right. There are multi-target (split, not AE) spells, but not given
multi-target rituals. I'd say Splitting the ritual dice both among
stages and "samples" is the likely equivalent. There may be fancier
ways, with higher drain, but those strike me as VERY big ritual mojo (I
remembr Sam Verners ghost dance ritual having many diffrent targets /
effects...)

-Mongoose X

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.