Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Waffelmeisters <evamarie@**********.NET>
Subject: Re: Skillz to pay the billz
Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 14:54:01 -0500
>
>
>
> Re: Skillz to pay the billz (Gurth , Fri 5:36)
>
> Ereskanti said on 8:13/21 May 98...
>
> > > Skills don't go below 1, so Bob would roll 1 die for firing most weapons.
> > >
> > This brings up a thought. Why can't a skill be brought to 0? Effectively the
> > person starts out with a Concentration Skill level? I don't see that as being
> > unreasonable or unfathomable. Ignoring Etiquettes here, what about the guy
> > "who only had pistols to practice with" etcera...???
>
> I'm guessing the reasoning FASA used is that you still know _something_
> about whatever you're doing, so you should be allowed one skill die
> regardless of how many get taken away by doing something that falls
> outside of your concentration or specialization.
>
> If you think this is too easy, maybe you could add a TN modifier to that
> one die? For example, +1 for every die that gets taken away that isn't
> there? Like, if you have Firearms (Pistols, Max-Power) at 2, you'd get a
> +3 because you'd have to take away three dice that aren't there.

The SRC has rules that allow you to "default" to a concentration or
specialization for genral skill rolls (orother defaults). (p. 48).
Rolling aconcentration is +2. Rolling a specialization is a further+1
(ie, +1 if the concetration you need includesthe specialization, +3
otherwise).
So, instead of rolling 1 genral skill die, you could roll your 3
concetration or 5 specialization dice, at a penalty. I'd say pool dice
are still limited to the actual skill that aplies to the test- you
couldfire a shotgun using "Pistols", but combat pool would be limited to
your "firearms".

-Mongoose X

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.