Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [Admin] Fixed, I hope.
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 13:33:58 +0100
And verily, did Gurth hastily scribble thusly...
|
|Mark A. Imbriaco said on 23:10/24 May 98...
|
|> Wasn't my fault. The software that runs the list had a fatal
|> error of some kind that caused it to disable the list as survival
|> mechanism in order to stay running to provide service to the other
|> lists. I gave it a swift kick in the rump and all seems to be
|> happy with the universe.
|
|Good, in that case you don't deserve to be thwapped, IMHO. Had you been
|thinking to yourself "I wonder what happens when I set this flag..." and
|ended up crashing the list, that would be another matter :)

There does still appear to be a slight problem with the list however.
Or am I the only one who's getting duplicate postings from some people?
(Including Gurth)

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.