From: | Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Admin] Fixed, I hope. |
Date: | Mon, 25 May 1998 13:33:58 +0100 |
|
|Mark A. Imbriaco said on 23:10/24 May 98...
|
|> Wasn't my fault. The software that runs the list had a fatal
|> error of some kind that caused it to disable the list as survival
|> mechanism in order to stay running to provide service to the other
|> lists. I gave it a swift kick in the rump and all seems to be
|> happy with the universe.
|
|Good, in that case you don't deserve to be thwapped, IMHO. Had you been
|thinking to yourself "I wonder what happens when I set this flag..." and
|ended up crashing the list, that would be another matter :)
There does still appear to be a slight problem with the list however.
Or am I the only one who's getting duplicate postings from some people?
(Including Gurth)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
|Principal Subjects in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
|Comp Sci & Electronics | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |