From: | Paul Gettle <pgettle@********.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: bad news) |
Date: | Mon, 25 May 1998 11:21:15 -0400 |
At 05:46 PM 5/24/98 -0500, D.Ghost wrote:
>On Sun, 24 May 1998 17:28:28 EDT Airwasp <Airwasp@***.COM> writes:
>>Okay everybody who wants in on the e-card for Barbi, send me
something
>private
>>... and just use the E-Card for Barbi as part of the subject header.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Mike
>
>Okay, :)
>
>Alfredo B. Alves (Pixel) <dghost@****.com>
Hello. I would like to call your attention to the part where Airwasp
indicates that people should "Send [him] something PRIVATE" (emphasis
added) if they want in on the e-card for Barbi.
You sent this TO THE WHOLE LIST. Thus, I must asume that you have a
unique and singular definition of the concept of private e-mail. This
definition is in conflict with the generally accpeted definition.
In other words: