Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Insect Totems
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 16:03:57 -0500
On Mon, 25 May 1998 16:14:33 -0400 BigDaddy <bigdaddy@*****.COM> writes:
><snip>
>The way I run the local campaign, that would work just fine, no
>problems - good idea, in fact. It would go well with the I.S.'s
>really being from 'otherwhere' and just incidentally looking like
>insects we know about. (Waiting out there to lure wandering initiates
>into opening a gateway for them to enter, the whole paranoia bug
>terror thing.). On the other hand, it changes a few precepts of how
>things are, and should be a house rule, at best.
>
>Some would make excellent totems, though - Ant, for instance.
><snip>

>i discussed this a while ago. many kool ideas came out of the discussion
>the only prob would be how to counter the effects that a queen spirit
>has on the shaman. Eventually the shaman would be possessed and then die
>or be a npc. how to deal with the prob yalL?
>--
> Napalm Sticks to Kidz,
> BigDaddy

Uhm ... what I suggested was a a different type of "insect Shaman" that
doesn't summon insect spirits so that wouldn't be a problem ...

Now About your posts:
Getting better ... at least your quoting the previous message but you
still need to identify the original post.
The standard format is :
<SNIP irrevelent material>
>Quoted Material
<SNIP irrevelent material>
>
>BigDaddy

My Reply (notice the spaces)

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, and RuPixel)

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.