Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: MC23 <mc23@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Idea for Spell Drain
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 13:06:37 -0400
Once upon a time, Airwasp wrote;

>Okay, something I have been mulling over for a spell design I am in the
>process of making is building in additional drain which will happen
>irregardless of how the normal drain for the spell is dealt with. And this
>extra damage is dealt with when the spell is done being sustained, or as soon
>as the spell is cast for Instantaneous spells.

<snip the rest>

Extra drain could be justified for use with sustained spells but I
don't understand it's use for an instantaneous spell. Instantaneous
Spells is handled all at once, Higher drain not multiple drain, that's
how the game mechanics are set up to handle things (1 staging is a higher
level). Two serious drains should be one deadly drain.
Sustained spells could make sense for a secondary drain but the +2
target modifier also represents this which does affect the mage greatly.
I could possibly see a recurring drain modifier for sustained spells
(like exclusive or fetish modifiers) where the drain is reduced but that
same drain must be tested against the beginning of every new turn.

That has some possibilities but I don't know if I would use it or
that it's what you were after.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.