From: | Gurth <gurth@******.NL> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Acers |
Date: | Tue, 26 May 1998 20:08:59 +0100 |
> >But where exactly does the difference between a suit of powered armor
> >and a walker vehicle lie?
>
> The suit of powered armour has an occupant? Is meant to be piloted
> internally instead of remotely? Something like that.
Not a walker _drone_, a walker _vehicle_ with a pilot inside. Sort of like
an AT-AT, AT-ST, or BattleMech but smaller. The difference between a suit
of powered armor and such a vehicle is very small, I feel. Perhaps the
best way of separating the two would be to call vehicles the pilot/wearer
stands in "powered armor," and ones where the pilot can sit down
"walkers."
> Yeah, go ahead. Build a new chassis. Technically, SRII tech should be
> able to handle it (just build a cyber body that's a little bigger and
> hollow), but it would be hugely expensive.
Naturally it should be expensive, we don't want players running around in
them, do we? :)
--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
We never choose to be anything but truthful. It's right there in our
manual, under Lies.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- + --+--
Version 3.1: | Incubated into
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N | the First Church of
o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ | the Sqooshy Ball
tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y? | 21 May 1998
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ + --+--