Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Robert Watkins <robert.watkins@******.COM>
Subject: Re: Real-Life Computing ...
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:40:18 +1000
NEWSHADOW writes:
>Does that mean that any computer that we buy now won't be affected by the
Y2K
>bug?


Actually, if any electronic equipment (including, say, your VCR or
microwave) that you purchased new in the last 2-3 years (since the Y2K
problem became big news) is affected by the Y2K problem, then you have a
strong legal case that they sold you defective equipment/software. Go see a
lawyer. Some consumer organisations are already organising similar cases, so
maybe you should go talk to Ralph Nader.

Which means that if Intel has a Y2K problem (mind you, I wasn't aware of
it... where could I get more info), you could sue them. :) Or at least ask
for a fix.

Oh, and it's not a bug, it's a feature. Seriously. It's a feature of the
hardware/software that it has a problem with the year 00, in that it was
invariably a design decision. Built-in limitations aren't bugs. That's why
it's correctly called the Y2K _problem_ (or Millennium Problem).

--
.sig deleted to conserve electrons. robert.watkins@******.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.