Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Insect Totems
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 00:41:40 -0500
On Tue, 26 May 1998 22:57:37 EDT Ereskanti <Ereskanti@***.COM> writes:
>In a message dated 5/26/98 6:27:30 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
<SNIP>
>I somehow think/believe that several people are missing the point here.
The
>"Bug City" type of Insect Shamans would be considered a "Toxic
Variant",
and
>thus have those special spirits and the appropriate rules.
Player-Character
>Insect Shamans would NOT have such access, and would be more like
"standard"
>totems, with possibly the option of conjuring/summoning "worker spirits"
that
>would follow rules similar to the "Work Loa" in the Awakenings Book for
the
>Voudon.
>
>Gosh folks, broaden a bit would ya???
>
>-K

Hmmm...I think the "Worker Spirits" would be too close to the original
Insect Spirits ... what I was just wondering was basically if anybody
thought anything wrong with following an insect totem like a normal totem
instead of like the standard rules ... (though if you say that Ant speaks
to you, your gonna get a heap of trouble ... [though it'd be pretty funny
if you said "Grasshopper says I have much to learn ..."])

:)

Hmmmm... making Insect Shamans Toxic? don't Toxics summon warped
versions of what the normals summon? (I believe there is a mention in
Grimmy about Toxic Insect Shamans...) I think if, this were done, Insect
shamans should be a different tradition (ie, you have Hermetics,
Shamans/Druids, and Insect Shamans)

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, and RuPixel)

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.