Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Hijacking
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 11:19:13 +0100
Waffelmeisters said on 14:32/26 May 98...

> I'm thinking the hi-jacking would be just an "attention getting
> manuever" and barganing chip, the real threat being much worse. Hell,
> they arel ikely tokill everone just as a "proof of intention" statement,
> instead of bargaining.

That would be a stupid move, because once all the hostages are dead you
give the CT teams a free hand -- they can come in without having to worry
about accidentally killing those hostages. Not to mention you've killed
one of the few things you can use to buy time with, if you're not planning
on bargaining.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
We never choose to be anything but truthful. It's right there in our
manual, under Lies.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- + --+--
Version 3.1: | Incubated into
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N | the First Church of
o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ | the Sqooshy Ball
tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y? | 21 May 1998
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ + --+--

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.