| From: | Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hijacking |
| Date: | Wed, 27 May 1998 07:35:26 -0500 |
>Waffelmeisters said on 14:32/26 May 98...
>> I'm thinking the hi-jacking would be just an "attention
getting
>> manuever" and barganing chip, the real threat being much worse. Hell,
>> they arel ikely tokill everone just as a "proof of intention"
statement,
>> instead of bargaining.
>That would be a stupid move, because once all the hostages are dead you
>give the CT teams a free hand -- they can come in without having to
worry
>about accidentally killing those hostages. Not to mention you've killed
>one of the few things you can use to buy time with, if you're not
planning
>on bargaining.
>
>--
>Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html -
<SNIP Sig>
I think he was referring to group A takes plane hostage, group gets
everyone's attention and describes threat posed by group B if demands
aren't met by a certain amount of time ... to prove they are serious,
Group A kills the passengers (and prolly suicides afterwards) ... Group B
is the real threat ...
D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, and RuPixel)
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
