From: | Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Acers |
Date: | Wed, 27 May 1998 19:08:05 -0500 |
>Matthew Waddilove said on 9:51/27 May 98,...
>> A way that I thought about getting around this is that the load cost
for
>> a bucket seat includes a 100kg person sitting in the seat, the seat
it's
>> self has no load cost. So once you have lopped off enough of the
>> 'passenger' the load cost should not be a problem.
>
>The way I understood it, the Load cost is for the seat plus the
>occupant. Normal car seats don't weigh 100 kg, I know that for certain
:)
>
>So yeah, you could rule that, say, 90 kg of that mass is the person
>sitting in it, and the seat itself is only 10 kg. Then you _could_ build
a
>drone with a bucket seat and put a skinny person in it to pilot the
thing, but
>IMHO it's getting very close to the edge of munchkinism.
>
>--
>Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html -
<SNIP Sig>
BTW, Gurth, I hope ya don't mind me mucking around with the formating of
your message so it looks nice :)
Uhm, Actually, R2 says that 100kg Load "cost" for a seat reflects 100 kg
alotment for the passenger so By-the-book, the seat itself is wieghtless
(doesn't make sense but that's the rules) so you just find a passenger
that can fit within the load restrictions of the vehicle (which prolly
means someone with a body of 1 or 2) or find a person and make them fit
...
D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, and RuPixel)
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]