Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: More T-Shirt Info (Mr. Imbriaco please)
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 11:43:37 +0100
Tim Kerby said on 20:57/27 May 98,...

> Don't even think about transfers. They don't last over time, or even
> several washings. Silk screen is the only way to go.

I already mentioned something similar in another post, but "Agreed."

> Ok, here's a problem. In the past, the list of names was almost the
> last thing that was done, because only those that actually ordered a
> shirt get their name on it, which means the list wasn't generated
> until the money was sent. The problem here is that in the past, the
> money went to one person, who compiled the names. We are considering
> ordering the shirt direct, so how do we compile a list of names?
> Putting the whole list subscription on there is one idea, but I think
> there are what, over 200 people subscribed?

400+, I was told a little while ago.

> Another option is to include anyone who votes for a shirt design.
> Since I am collecting the votes, I could also compile the names from
> that.

I'm still in favor of only putting on the names of people who actually buy a
shirt. I don't really see any problem with this, it worked okay the past few
years so why should we change it for this shirt?

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
At the bar down the Adios Lounge.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- + --+--
Version 3.1: | Incubated into
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N | the First Church of
o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ | the Sqooshy Ball
tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y? | 21 May 1998
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ + --+--

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.