Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Alfredo B Alves <dghost@****.COM>
Subject: Re: VR 2.0
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 23:25:32 -0500
On Thu, 28 May 1998 17:36:01 -0400 Phil Levis <pal@**.BROWN.EDU> writes:
>On Thu, 28 May 1998, Jeremy "Bolthy" Zimmerman wrote:
>> I do believe there's upgrading rules in the book. And purchased
copies
>> come with the source code as part of their price. Without the source,
it
>> costs about 25% less. I think you just have to subtract one size from
the
>> other to determine cost/time to program.

>Yeah... these rules seem a little too simple to me. I'd think that
>updgrading a program should take slightly longer. Otherwise, there's no
>reason to write things from scratch, because some Restrict-10 Area DINAB
>targeting program is actually just the result of a slow improvement of
>that Restrict-3 you had five years ago.
>
>Phil

Golden Rule of Programming: Only code something once.

As a programmer programs, he/she(/it) tends to build a library of
utilities, procedures, functions, etc ... which get reused in later
programs ... Also, it is a good programming practice NOT to write things
all at once ... you write a simple version of a program, then upgrade,
add features, etc ... look at Adam's PS 98, for example (Adam: hope ya
don't mind me using this for an example ;) ... he didn't write the final
version all at once ...

The VR 2.0 rules make good sense, IMO :)

D.Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, and RuPixel)
At someone's estimate of 4k nuyen a day, VR 2.0 makes good cents too ;)

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.