Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Firearms vs. Military Strategy
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 12:16:00 +0100
Fade said on 2:58/31 May 98,...

> Any army guys out there, what's standard anti-sniper tactics?
> It'd be nice to know, since it will soon crop up in the current
> campaign.

Not that I've been in the army, but a few things I can think of is
to spray the sniper's suspected position with fire, and/or lob some
high explosives into the area -- mortars should work fine here, or
automatic grenade launchers. Trying to pick off the sniper is
much too difficult.

> Anyone seen 'Full Metal Jacket', I think it was?

I saw that a few years ago, but I can't remember all that much of
it.

> The scene where a VC sniper shot a guy in the foot, so he lies in the
> open, screaming in pain?
> Anyone going to help him is shot dead.
> If noone goes out to help him, he's shot a few more times, just to
> make him scream louder and demoralize the other guys.

This is actually something used by VC forces a lot. Wound
someone, then pick off the medic coming to their aid (or anyone
else, of course, but I believe it was often the idea of getting the
medic).

This also happens, in a slightly different way, in "84 Charlie
Mopic," BTW.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html - UIN5044116
Your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- + --+--
Version 3.1: | Incubated into
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N | the First Church of
o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ | the Sqooshy Ball
tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y? | 21 May 1998
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ + --+--

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.