Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle <pgettle@********.NET>
Subject: Re: Again ... E-card for Barbi ...
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 10:35:03 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 05:34 AM 5/31/98 +0000, Pantherr wrote:
>> Anyone else want to join in on the E-card for Barbie ?
>>
>> The list is pretty short for the moment guys ...
>
>Make sure I'm at the top of the list if in any way shape or form
>possible. If ya need a reason, send me a private email.

I got called to the carpet the last time I gave a big ascii thwap to
someone over this e-card buisness, so I won't do that again. I would
like to state at this point that I am not in any shape, manner, or
form a member of GridSec, so this is not offical at all.

When I thwapped the last guy who replied, I promised that I would
publicly thwap everyone who replied to this e-card by emailing the
list. To be fair to the last person I thwapped, I feel I should keep
that promise, so here's a teeny-tiny thwap: *THWAP!*

(Note to GridSec: this is not a thwap out of anger, merely me keeping
a promise to the list and trying to be fair.)
(Note to Everyone: Vigilante thwapping is wrong. Let GridSec handle
list problems, I am merely doing this to keep my promise of public
thwapping, so as not to single out the last victim of my thwap.)

Please, everyone, your _replies_ about the e-card should be directed
through private mail to the individual collecting the addresses for
the e-card, and not to the list as a whole.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3

iQCVAwUBNXFqhs2C0fERRVM5AQH8KAQAjDW7xg38lfX0ZEcS7z4h38o1SqQOlocs
0U7V1cB1hXwoxIrZmRdZUw8KC9N2HZmqqe6JEcuzQQPQhnGXMv2u941hNyI9fj+F
ov8zyq4eKsPTGQbxKN3IrDtp2Ao1D1a1r1nQz76vSFuC50Ms/g5IZ6zcpyH6g0lC
lp0qNSSVBRw=
=+QMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle (pgettle@********.net)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:11455339 (RSA 1024, created 97/08/08)
625A FFF0 76DC A077 D21C 556B BB58 00AA

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.