Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dghost@****.com dghost@****.com
Subject: What's a w.oodchuck?
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 20:32:56 -0600
On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 21:19:34 -0500 Devotely Apathetic <Apathy@******.com>
writes:
>Dave Post wrote:
>> I'm just wondering why would a woodchuck chuck wood in the first
place?
>> And, if he did, wouldn't he bring GreenWar, oops, I mean Greenpeace
down on
>> himself for hurting the enviroment by chucking all that wood around in
the
>> first place?

>Advertising laws. If a woodchuck didn't chuck wood he'd get all kind of
law
>suits for fraud, misrepresentation...you name it. Do you know how much
a
>woodchuck lawyer costs?

I'm no lawyer but I think that just means that if someone approaches the
woodchuck with some wood to be chucked, said woodchuck must chuck the
aforementioned wood (for a reasonable fee) or face legal repecussions.
Now the exception is if said woodchuck has already chucked his or her
quota of wood for the day. If the woodchuck has met this quota, then any
additional wood chucked may charged an additional overwood fee. The
definition of an international standard has been sought for some time
now. The woodchuck wood chuck standard movement lost some steam after an
US President was caught altering wood chuck reports (see
*Woodchuckgate*). The movement has recovered and soon hopes to make 42
the woodchuck wood chuck standard.

--
D. Ghost
(aka Pixel, Tantrum, RuPixel)
"We called him Mother Superior because of the length of his habit" --
Trainspotting
"A magician is always 'touching' himself" --Page 123, Grimoire (2nd
Edition)

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.