From:	Devotely Apathetic Apathy@******.com
Subject:	What's a w.oodchuck?
Date:	Tue, 02 Feb 1999 02:04:27 -0500

dghost@****.com wrote:
> I'm no lawyer but I think that just means that if someone approaches the
> woodchuck with some wood to be chucked, said woodchuck must chuck the
> aforementioned wood (for a reasonable fee) or face legal repecussions.
> Now the exception is if said woodchuck has already chucked his or her
> quota of wood for the day. If the woodchuck has met this quota, then any
> additional wood chucked may charged an additional overwood fee. The
> definition of an international standard has been sought for some time
> now. The woodchuck wood chuck standard movement lost some steam after an
> US President was caught altering wood chuck reports (see
> *Woodchuckgate*). The movement has recovered and soon hopes to make 42
> the woodchuck wood chuck standard.
>
> --
> D. Ghost

42 what? Will this 'international woodchuck standard' make allowance
for
hardwood versus softwood? Will it make allowances for those woodchucks
(Who no fault of their own) are somehow impaired in their ability to
meet this standard? If this standard is to result in a acceptable work
load for those meta physad woodchucks as well as those woodchucks who
are
more 'reality' grounded and don't have the option of being a physad
woodchuck? Perhaps we should arrange for 'enchancement' through
mechanical means of these under-advantaged woodchucks. We should keep
a vigilant lookout against those meta physad woodchucks trying to sneak
in and get these enchancements for themselves. That could lead to an
escalating power struggle that could demolish the world, and all the
wood there-in, as we know it.

DA

PS> Under no circumstance should this standard allow or encourage the
use of
growth hormones.

PPS> Could a woodchuck be trained to work in other agricultural areas?
Such
as soy. Could Soychucks be the new secret weapon of Stuff-it Shacks?