Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: MC23 mc23@**********.com
Subject: [DNS] Returned mail: Host unknown
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 99 23:06:03 -0500
I still get some posts that won't go through no matter how many times I
try sending it. Other posts have no troubles.


>The original message was received at Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:01:14 -0500 (EST)
>from user-38s0bk5.dialup.mindspring.com [209.192.46.133]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><shadowrn@*****.html.com>
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 <shadowrn@*****.html.com>... Host unknown (Name server:
>lists.html.com: host not found)
>
>Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp3.mindspring.com
>Received-From-MTA: DNS; user-38s0bk5.dialup.mindspring.com
>Arrival-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:01:14 -0500 (EST)
>
>Final-Recipient: RFC822; shadowrn@*****.html.com
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.1.2
>Remote-MTA: DNS; lists.html.com
>Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:01:15 -0500 (EST)
>
>Return-Path: <mc23@**********.com>
>Received: from [209.192.46.133] (user-38s0bk5.dialup.mindspring.com
>[209.192.46.133])
> by smtp3.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA26874
> for <shadowrn@*****.html.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:01:14 -0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <199902030401.XAA26874@*****.mindspring.com>
>Subject: Re: Old Flames :)
>Date: Tue, 2 Feb 99 23:01:14 -0500
>x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v2, June 6, 1997
>From: MC23 <mc23@**********.com>
>To: <shadowrn@*****.html.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.