Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: chimerae@***.ie chimerae@***.ie
Subject: (Fwd) Re: A question...
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 08:51:36 +0000
I got this one back the first time (must be an anti-Ms filter :)

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
From: Self <aelfin>
To: shadowrn@*****.html.com
Subject: Re: A question...
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 20:20:02

and thus did Tim Kerby speak on 1 Feb 99 at 20:41:

> Oh, I don't hate people that work for MS. On the contrary. I feel
> sorry for them. I hear they pay shit and treat the same. Hell, look
> at what they did to those thousands of temp employees, and that is
> something we know about.

(since this list is a free for all I can reply :)
I don't think I'm being treated badly so far, the flexible working
hours are nice, first company I work for with a decent cantina with
cheap food, drinks are free, and I'm satisfied with the money. I guess
it depends which side of the fence you are.

> My negative feelings for Microsoft intensified when I went through
> the MCSE certification process for my job. I have never seen a
> program that has such a loathing and contempt for its participants
> as that one. It is designed to make you fail. And then when people
> outsmart it and figure it out, they change the rules. Seems to me
> you would want to encourage people to learn about your products and
> lower your support costs, but I guess that is just me. I guess it
> does create a market for those $1000 support contracts and $1.20 a
> minute support calls, though.

Strange, they must do things differently on this side of the pond.
They're not easy to get, but I know quite a few people who managed to
get whole series of them. As soon as I'm there for 6 months I'll give
them a try and see what's the story with them.


Karina & Martin Steffens
chimerae@***.ie

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.