From:	XaOs [David Goth] xaos@*****.net
Subject:	[OT] Filter Test
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 1999 01:32:05 -0600

> It's also an example of the differences in philophosy between IE and
> Netscape. Netscape doesn't want to be the world's best email/news/web

It doesn't? Whatever they're naming the 4.0 version, seems to be trying just
that.

> As for Joshua... when Outlook (or Outlook Express) starts implementing its
> filter system in a way that actually works consistently, I'll be
> impressed.

Mine (Outlook 98) seems to work pretty consistantly. Occasionally I question
some of it's spam filters, but I'm careful enough that nothing gets
accidentally deleted. (A ShadowRN poster or two have set off the 'porn'
filters a few times. hehe).

> The only reason I use Outlook is because we send our appointments
> via it, so
> that my schedule gets updated with meetings correctly. (Incidentally, if
> anyone knows of an appointment manager that understands the format Outlook
> sends meeting requests in, I'd be gratified if you inform me of it)

It sure as hell isn't Lotus Notes. I have to use that turd at work.

-XaOs-
xaos@*****.net
-David Goth-