Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam J adamj@*********.html.com
Subject: Open Source SR
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 04:20:33 -0700
At 23:50 2/6/99 -0800, David Hayes wrote:


>i think that although this might piss off some people on the list,
>keeping the project on this list would be a good idea because it is not
>separated. it is more visible. people will see our posts and comment or
>actually contribute ideas. it might draw more people and get them
>interested.
>maybe, maybe not.

I really don't like the idea of keeping ShadowCreations content on
ShadowRN. It would turn off people who want to work on the SC project but
don't want to read all the RN mail, and it would make it that much harder
for the organizer(s) to keep track of it.

I would probably post updates every couple of weeks to ShadowRN, just a
short couple paragraphs of what's going on, what's being written, what we
could need, etc.

>>1. The first one is a quite-organised-semi-oprganised. You assign
>specific
>>authors to a specific task, set a strict deadline, and wait for the
>final
>>products to drift in.
>
>i like this one more than any other structure. you might have to nag,
>but stuart is right, if people know you are firm on the deadline and
>will not budge, they will either get it done, or they won't. but more
>often than not they will get it done.

This is the way I would prefer to do it. It's how Hayden did it over in
the early days of NERPS, and it seemed to work the best. Although part of
that was everyone was scared of Hayden :-)

>>(b) would undoubtedly be a 'tendering' process. People write a short
>>synopsis/application for their article, and submit it. Everyone one the
>>list pursues those applications, and everyone on the list is able to
>vote
>>for their favourite applications.

>that sounds really good too.

Personally, I think that Any article submitted should be looked at, because
often times you hear the idea for something and it ends up being completely
different from what you thought it would be. Also, article direction tends
to change as it gets written.. I'm a big fan of not judging something until
I see it (Unless the concept is truly ridiculous to start).

I agree that all final articles should have some sort of approval process
from the list at large. After all, it's a group project..

-Adam J
--
< http://shadowrun.html.com/tss / adamj@*********.html.com >
< ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader / TSA Co-Admin / ICQ# 2350330 >
< FreeRPG & Shadowrun Webring Co-Admin / The Shadowrun Supplemental >
< ShadowFAQ: http://shadowrun.html.com/shadowfaq >
< "She pretty much walks around perpetually pissed at Mick." >
< - Kevin Kelly, on professional wrestler Mick Foleys wife Colleen >

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.