| From: | Gurth gurth@******.nl |
|---|---|
| Subject: | A perfectly acceptable reason to test the new list... |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Feb 1999 11:38:38 +0100 |
the street was...
> Erm.... That's pretty munchkin. Anytime the logic goes "It's only X
> essence", the character is looking at the rules, and not at their character
> background.
So? I have a feeling there are _very_ few SR players who truly never
thought to themselves "Well, if I get this then I can add that in for less
Essence..." By your reasoning, any time a street sam gets cybereyes with
low-light, thermographic, and flare compensation (IOW the standard
package), it's munchkin because the player is paying attention to the
Essence loss...
Furthermore, it's easy enough to explain all this _in_ character as well:
the doc tells the character: "I can either remove your eyes and saw away
part of your skull to accomodate all the options you want in your eye,
then replace your own eyes, or I can remove the natural eyes and pop in
cybereyes that have all those featurs built in and give you perfect vision
at the same time."
--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
If it's no use pretending, then I don't want to know.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-
GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998
