Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jhary-a-Conel jhary-a-conel@***.net
Subject: (no subject)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 04:51:45 +0100
On 8 Feb 99, at 14:14, Seraph wrote:
> Personally, I dont see anything wrong with html. Just get a decent mail
> program that can handle it.
Yeah. Exactly. I wanna send HTML as EMail, too... or rather, I for
one would prefer RTF. Hey, get me right - I hate the Microsoft-
RTF, but the Adobe RTF is cool.

So, let's have RTF - the right one. If someone's old-time browser,
let's send HTML as well. Well... better HTML 2.0 and HTML 4.0,
as we want to be downward compatible with Netscape 1.0.

Oh - and for those people who belive EMail should consist of
information rather then background pictures, and several fonts that
are not displayed on my computer, as they are not installed, let's
have a TXT-version as well. Not that anybody would need it - we all
use "decent mail program" like Netscape or the IE...

wait... wait. Thaose are Web browsers, without sorting filters,
without the possibility to filter mail... without the possibility to
create aliases... but it can display bold, italics, and underlied text.
For sure that doesn't matter - as we all know, information must be
colored, and whenever psossible, moving.

I mean - you _are_ reading the web right now,don't you=?

Jhary
--
+---___---------+----------------------------------------+--------------------+
| / / _______ | JaC / SP | "It's probably just|
| / /_/ ____/ | Jhary-a-Conel@***.net | another old, German|
| \___ __/ | ICQ#: 7 517 216 | tradition..." |
|==== \_/ ======| *Wearing hats is just a way of life* | -- Dvixen |
|LOGOUT FASCISM!| - Me |(on her Europe trip)|
+------------- http://www.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jhary -----------------+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.