From:	Paul Gettle RunnerPaul@*****.com
Subject:	Headware Memory
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 1999 18:31:40 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 01:15 AM 2/10/99 -0500, Starrngr@***.com wrote:
>Most
>people who install datajacks have headware memory, for one reason or
another,
>mostly to tuck the odd knowsoft right into headware, or other such
off the top
>of the head data. Those who dont tend to be types who have tied so
much
>essance up in other things they cant afford even the .1 a bit of
headware
>memory would cost.

Most people, or most shadowrunners? What about majority of upright
uptight corporate citizens who wouldn't want any cyberware in their
body, but their job requires a datajack because they have to heavy
matrix work at least some part of the work day? Would they go ahead
then, and get some headware memory on top of the datajack they never
really wanted? Or how about the simesense junkies who are getting a
jack merely because the ASIST signal through a trode-net sucks rocks?

The datajack has almost exclusive status as the only socially
acceptable piece of cyberware. I stand behind my statement that there
are quite a few datajacks out there that don't have headware memory
installed too.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNsIW1KPbvUVI86rNAQFRfwP9HuI2V8wCERiuktYE2QbuSANoJLA8QWPa
SZswtE/5SdTBvceFxaxaHfwnRbyJQrHD0ejcGtPMmIws1gh8yLSpB+/55tE4/NBe
HA5oEZsqQMugV+BpYmQ0XNQn0YpHA1pIRg0vyYprk6A/m8cM8GhydqGnnspdH31b
HkvImOHKWoI=FGVd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344