Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle RunnerPaul@*****.com
Subject: SR Movies List [OT]
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 21:34:49 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 06:52 AM 2/12/99 +1000, Lady Jestyr wrote:
>>(I suppose the movie Casino Royale has been omitted from
consideration
>>for the sake of clarity, as _everyone_ who starred in that movie
>>played James Bond.)
>
>David Niven was the star, wasn't he...? Hmm, no, Casino Royale is
widely
>accepted as being a Bond spoof, as it were, rather than a 'real' Bond
flick.

A spoof film? Even though Casino Royale is directly adapted from the
very first James Bond novel written by Ian Flemming? I'll grant you
that Casino Royale wasn't put out by Albert R. Broccoli's & Harry
Saltzman's production company, but then again, neither was Never say
Never Again.

Films like Austin Powers are Bond spoofs, but Casino Royale, while
downright silly, _DOES_ focus around the exploits of a spy named James
Bond, License #007, serving on Her Majesty's Secret Service, and _IS_
based off of one of Ian Flemming's James Bond novels.

If sillyness is a disqualifying factor for what's a "real" Bond flick,
we'd have to cross most of the Roger Moore Bond films off the list
too, as they too are somewhat guilty of being spoofs of the more
serious Bond films. :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNsOTJqPbvUVI86rNAQEHQAP/eqg8q0sOeRmDeEtXnaHkhigqKtzxro95
ZKmMHRyhnscZFXGtDkIYkcxEOLNoh1Sy9ygDnD5oCXctIEaTUI2Ui+w33kJoBq17
S/SUKqQmtnBaWkq0l2CsuAJ12YQzjAOIl4oF/E6XO1ncdeMhEAzgy6NW8rLoZY3Q
ucuoQkqqY34=YSiW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.