Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: Psionics
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 11:40:15 +0100
According to EdgeWalker, at 1:07 on 16 Feb 99, the word on
the street was...

> I've been flicking through my Alternity (c) rulebook and happened across the
> idea of trying to import the idea of Psionics in to shadowrun.
>
> Does anyone have any views on this subject?
>
> I have a base idea for Psionics but would appreciate some advice and/or help
> from some of the more experience rich members of the list.

There are roughly three views on psionics:

1) They're a different type of magician, using rules of their own;
2) They're normal magicians who explain their magical abilities by saying
they're psionics (and believe this themselves), using the normal magic
rules;
3) We don't want no stinkin' psionics :)

Judging by Awakenings, FASA subscribes to #2 -- Awakenings describes
several people who think of themselves as something other than "standard"
magicians, but who use magic just like everyone else when it comes down to
it. A psionic would be either a sorcerer or a full magician who knows
mainly spells that affect the mind (Control Thoughts, Mind Probe, and so
on) and/or spells that can be mistaken for ones that do (Mana Bolt,
Decrease Attribute, etc.).

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
There's no such things as a "brown alert," sir.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.