Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Shaun E. Gilroy shaung@**********.net
Subject: SR Books Online
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:24:03 -0500
At 12:05 PM 2/16/99 EST, you wrote:
>In a message dated 99-02-16 05:41:38 EST, you write:
>
>> BTW, if Shadowbeat is made out to be the "holy grail" so often on this
>> list, how come it only got rated 6.9 in the survey? :)
>>
>> > Maybe we could help, or, as one list subscriber put it, even do it for
>> > them, almost?
>>
>> Like I said in another post, I certainly wouldn't mind doing something
>> like this. It's very unlikely to ever happen, but still...
>>
>
>Probobly because so few of us have it. I for one, am surprised at just how
>many questions I have had have been refered to text in Shadowbeat. I
mean, it
>really sounds like it should have been the hot product, since it covered so
>much of the incidentals that make a setting real... the little things, like
>how much does your music chip hold, what are professional sports like in 20x,
>etc.
>
>Personally, I'm surprised it got such a low rating too.
>
>

My theory on that is because ShadowBeat is about nothing in particular...
Just stuff (mostly media-related). It has no major story elements or
tie-ins; it has no new guns or hot tech; and It has very, -very- bad artwork.

At first glance sitting on the shelf, it looks like a watered down version
of NAGRL. You have to actually sit down and start reading it before you
realize: "Hey, this book has a -lot- of good information in it.

The guy who got me into Shadowrun used to sit around and talk about how
cool that book was or I would have never given it a second glance.



Shaun Gilroy [shaung@**********.net]
Online Technologies Corp.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.