Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jordan findlerman@*****.com
Subject: fox special: when MetaBeings attack!
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 13:44:39 -0800 (PST)
> Word of warning: novels are rarely considered "canon." Authors
> have this obnoxious way of ignoring rules to further a story

True, it was just the first example that came to mind. Though, i
don't think that the author thought that the mage twitching would
further the plot line.
> Sure, but all you'd be recording would be the gross muscle
> movements (which RAS overrides would take out anyway), the
"bleedthrough"
> of the signal that gets into the motor-control areas of the mage's
brain.
> To me, this represents that fact that the mage, in his or her moment
of
> panic, is losing control of his or her will, and is acting out of an
> "instinct" developed in a different envionment (i.e. the real
world). If
> something jumps out at you, you duck. By the same token, if you're
> concentrating really hard on trying to smack a guy in astral space,
maybe
> you arm twitches as your brain gets momentarily confused about
"which" arm
> you're moving (the real one or the astral one). But this doesn't
change
> the fact that the stimuli that caused that arm to twitch don't get
> recorded.
> So the audience would feel like they were having an epileptic
> seizure, not like they were in astral combat. Not what you'd call a
> box-office hit.
>

You missed the point entirely....maybe I wasn't clear enough. It
isn't that they twitch, it is that there is something there to *make*
them twitch, which the brain responds to. INPUT! From the astral
body, to the meat-bod's brain. This could be recorded. Side note:
Mage's don't have RAS, that would require cyberware in a mage, which
no one would ever do... :)

--Fin

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.