| From: | Jordan findlerman@*****.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Aussie Question [OT] (Kinda) |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:38:35 -0800 (PST) |
> > parlance? I know it refers to humans, but I'm not sure if it means
> > anything special. Tusker, that's pretty obvious. Dandelion-eater,
> > that's easy enough to grasp. But breeder...there must be something
> > blatantly, glaringly obvious that I'm missing. Enlighten me,
please.
>
> I never really understood that insult, especially because it's
supposedly
> used by orks
Hmmm...I have only heard it used a lot by Elves. I took this to mean
the following.
Given: Elves don't much care for Humans, and Vise Versa.
Also Given: The metahuman races elves and dwarves are conceived in 1
of two ways.
1. The two parenting parties involved are of that metahuman class. or
2. They are born of Human parents (Homo sapien sapien) and have
'goblinized' as a result of UGE (Unexplained Genetic Expression)
Now then, Given elven attitudes twards most humans, elves may see
human's only 'redeeming factor is the ability to produce elven
offspring, ence the word breeder : You are only good for making more
elves, you have no other worth.
To a lesser (perhaps more) extent, the Trolls and Ork metaspecies may
have this viewpoint too as the two means of 'bringing little trolls
and orks into this world' are:
1. Being born of two parents of the metaspecies, or
2. 'Goblinizing' at Puberty.
Again, given inter-(meta)human-relation attitudes, orks and trolls may
see humans only redeeming trait as:
You have the ability to produce humans who goblinize into beutiful
little trolls and orks.
Just my 0.02¥ (still waiting for someone to tell me what local tax
rates are for the server's location.)
--Fin
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @*****.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
