From:	A Halliwell u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk
Subject:	Breeder definition
Date:	Thu, 18 Feb 1999 11:20:28 +0000 (GMT)

And verily, did Patrick Goodman hastily scribble thusly...
|
|From: Steven A. Tinner
|Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 11:29 AM
|
|>However, since it's almost always applied to humans, I feel that it
|>might also refer to the fact that humans are the only metatype that
|>has children goblines/UGE into another BREED.
|
|Okay, this brings up a question that's surfaced several times in the local
|group: We know that people still occasionally, even frequently, goblinize
|into orks and trolls. Are there still transformations from normal to elves
|and dwarves?

Still? There never have been. Dwarves and Elves were *all* born that way.

Were there transformation into elves and dwarves to start
|with?

Nope.

The historical text in the main SR3 rulebook (and its predecessors)
|seem to indicate that there were not any such transformations, but the
|population figures tend to indicate that there had to be.

Why? Humans gave birth to elves and dwarves.


--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |