Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Kama kama@*******.net
Subject: [OT] Dice from Hell
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:01:25 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Dvixen wrote:

> At 02:40 PM 2/19/99 , Jett annoyed me by writing:
> >I love my leather dicebag, however the d4s I have in there are starting to
> poke
> >through since the leather is very soft. I'm thinking I need seperate dicebags
> >for Shadowrun and AD&D.
>
> I just took a peek at my dice shelf (yes *shelf*) and I have.... No dice
> bags, but 18 boxes. (Well, two bags, but they have Paolo's dice. The ones
> he brought from Italy, at any rate. ;) The kind that the gaming stores get
> their bulk dice in, msotly, some are craft boxes I made a few years back,
> and they hold up quite nicely. (I make the best dice boxes. :) The bigger
> one is 6"x4"x2" The smaller on is 3" round, iirc. *shrug*
>
> I had 476 before GenCon two years ago, and I bought ... a LOT at GenCon,
> and a few more since I got home. I'm guessing I'm pushing 600 or so dce...
> My fave dice containers, are film control strip containers from Fuji and
> Kodak that I get from work. They'll spill if you drop them, so I usually
> keep them closed with tape of an elastic.
>
> I should make up another puzzle of my dice soon. The last one is way out of
> date. It has only 350ish. ;)
>
> Obsessive? Nah. I just like having a collection to be PROUD of.
>

I understand perfectly! You'll note that the count of 491 was the dice
CURRENTLY residing in the bag I take to games. I have a few dozens more
hanging around the house. (Doesn't everyone have sets of dice beside their
bed in case the wake up in the middle of the night and need them?) At
first, Blair didn't understnad why I could possible feel the need to buy
more dice. Now, he has learned to not only indulge me, but participate.
After all, what is a Christmas stocking without SOME dice in the toe?

Kama

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.