Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Mongoose m0ng005e@*********.com
Subject: skillsoft chips
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 03:42:09 -0600
:> I don't think you can burn a chip (of any kind) without its source
:> code. Unless you somehow got the source code for a skillsoft (which
the
:> price of the chip probaly does not include), you are out of luck as far
as
:> making more goes. Anti-tamper measures are not really needed.
:
: I would say that the source code isn't needed, just the proper
:equipment and software. I personally have two cd-roms that are direct
:copies of the originals, made with a cd writer using a direct copy
:method. Having the source code would allow for tweaking but isn't IMO
:necessary for a simple copy. Of course there still may be a problem
:if the original chip includes anti-tamper/anti-copy measures.


In SR so far, you can't make copy's of (certain kinds of) chips
without the source-code. There are certain analogues today- it is (as far
as I know) much easier to duplicate a neural net given its description
than given a "black box" status of neural net input / output. Holographic
processes also are much easier to reproduce given the original setup info.
Given that Skillsofts appear to (perhaps) be holographic memory
representations operated on a neural net...

Mongoose

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.