Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: skillsoft chips
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:35:08 +0100
According to Ken, at 23:00 on 20 Feb 99, the word on
the street was...

> Now I'm still one of those folks that don't have a CD ROM burner so I'm not
> real up on the whole thing yet but there used to be a degradation in quality
> when you made a copy of something. Nothing too noticeable on the first copy
> but if you took that copy and copied it and so on things'll start looking
> pretty nasty.

That's only for analog systems. If you hook two VCRs (video cassette
recorders, not vehicle control rigs :) together, and keep making copies of
copies of copies, you'll end up with very poor picture quality -- I've
seen one often-copied tape that was black and white in the original, but
the one I watched had bright yellow and other colors through it, for
example. The only way to watch it was to turn the TV to b/w.

OTOH anything digital can be copied indefinitely without loss of quality:
put two hard drives into your PC, and copy an AVI file from one drive to
the other and back again several dozen times. The final copy will have a
picture qualty that's just as good (or bad :) as the original's. One thing
that can cause loss of quality is damage to the hard disk, but that's not
usually something you need to consider.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
There's no such things as a "brown alert," sir.
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.