Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer dbuehrer@******.carl.org
Subject: exchange rates, and APDS...pronounced APP-ee-das ? : )
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:07:59 -0700 (MST)
Gurth wrote:
/
/ According to Robert Watkins, at 10:38 on 23 Feb 99, the word on
/ the street was...
/
/ > In an APDS bullet, you have a hard, dense core (the 'armour piercing'
/ > portion), surrounded by a jacket that will come off when fired (the
/ > 'discarding sabot' portion). On being fired, the sabot will strip away from
/ > the dense core. This causes the bullet to become more stable or something,
/ > or possibly reduces the friction... I'm not exactly up on ammo design.
/
/ The way this works is that the round as a whole (including the sabots) is
/ usually lighter than a normal round would be, but it has the same amount
/ of propellant behind it. The net result is a higher velocity, and thus
/ more kinetic energy in the bullet. The reason the sabots fall away after
/ firing is because the smaller cross-section of the bullet makes it have
/ higher armor-piercing capabilities -- the same energy over a smaller area
/ means more energy per square millimeter, thus it'll punch through more
/ armor.

The smaller size also has less friction, making it more accurate over
long ranges.

Basically you end up with a high velocity, high mass round with a small
cross section that has good armor piercing ability and low drop off.

/ Tungsten and uranium are the normal materials APFSDS is made of (BTW, APDS
^^^^^^
Armor Piercing Fin Stabalized Discarding Sabot for the uninitiated :)

-David B.
--
"Earn what you have been given."
--
ShadowRN GridSec
email: dbuehrer@******.carl.org
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.