Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Protokol13 Protokol13@********.com
Subject: Q?: Mist form - Ghouls - Decking
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 15:13:39 -0500
Jordan wrote:

> >> 1. Mist form:
> >> Does a vampire using mist form keep his clothes ?
> >> Does he take with him what he is holding ?
>
> >A mist-formed vamp keeps his clothes and little else. If he/she has
> >*any* cyberware in him/her/it, it will at that time fall out. Any
> >gear carried with it will be dropped as it's hand's molecules become
> >too loose to support anything. The clothes it gets to keep, and this
> >includes (GM discretion) armoured clothing, but no other armour.
>

Wouldn't it really suck to be a vamp with cyberware then? I would think
that since a part of someone's essence is lost in the process of
installation, the cyberware in fact dematerializes, because it is
indiscernible from the the rest of the body at that point. But I would
also be one to argue completely on a vamp getting cyberware during the
infection, because of the apparent essence instability within the infected
being. As such, I would reduce it down the the following rules:

* A drawback of being infected is not being able to get any further
cyberware, for it has no permanent essence to rely on.

* An cyberware that was on the infected creature before the fact, will
remain as such. And will travel along with him, even in mist form.

* Clothing and a variable amount of gear can be taken along as well.
Depending on how powerful the infected being is, and his level of mastery
of the power.


That's what I currently would do if any such situation would arise in my
group. I'm open to debate though, because I'm not sure if any book give
specific details in handling this situation.

-=PrOtoKol13=-
ICQ: 17589925

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.