Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Gettle RunnerPaul@*****.com
Subject: Mail sent to ShadowRN
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:55:45 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 02:22 PM 2/24/99 -0500, Ereskanti@***.com wrote:
>In a message dated 2/24/1999 11:38:03 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
shadowrn-
>admin@*********.org writes:
>
>> Your mail to 'ShadowRN' with the subject:
>> General Announcement (Psionics)
>> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>> The reason it is being held:
>> Too many recipients.
>> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will
receive
>> notification of the moderator's decison.
>
>
>Okay, now this message was new to me. Anyone else received anything
like this
>for their postings recently?

Never gotten one of those, no. Were you sending that post to both the
list address and any other addresses at the same time? (Either
multiple addresses in the To: line or CC:ed to someone?) The reason I
ask, is that this message sounds like a spamfilter, to keep the list
from getting included in a Mass-Mailing sent to several addresses.

(We did get hit by someone's Convention-spam a few days back. It was
an email that was sent to several dozen RPG lists. It could be that
the admins put up a filter as a result)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQCVAwUBNtRnSqPbvUVI86rNAQHiaQP8DWSuEFQu0iAPlV+oiBvhfD6PrQEuiWvI
j2eGVDa5++trEarresgj2cguKOzOdfNpOCrNcIuTtKRCqNIKGZ8M70IVHhb1hBNy
KvORrODJ12gGCctdSsGxtkztcYblPVaZrL41ghQnJw4q6noc7qqPBDALIVOOu2O+
5FJpD8Xd1Dk=R0F2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
-- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.