Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Hinkley dhinkley@***.org
Subject: APDS
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 03:24:08 -0800
Date sent: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 10:59:46 -0500
To: shadowrn@*********.org
From: Paul Gettle <RunnerPaul@*****.com>
Subject: Re: APDS
Send reply to: shadowrn@*********.org

{SNIP}
>
>
> Acording to this theory, the reason that smartlink is better than
> smartgoggles, with a -2 instead of a -1, is because the smartlink
> allows the shooter to cybernetically trigger the firing mechanism,
> thus freeing the gun from the small jerk caused by the finger pulling
> the trigger, making for a more stable gun at the time of firing.

Interesting thought, I always thought it was the goggles. That the system
projected the targeting icon (spot, cross hair what ever) on to the inside of
the goggle lense. If you do not position the goggles just right on your head
the targeting icon would not be in the right place. With the cyber version
once calibrated the relationship between the eye and the target icon would be
set perminately.

>
> I've always played my smartguns as slightly smarter than this, but not
> excessively so. (Some people run their smartguns as having a full
> blown Friend-or-Foe image recognition system built in, which is a bit
> much for my opinion, I don't think they're _that_ smart.)
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
>
> iQCVAwUBNtQh4aPbvUVI86rNAQEM+gQAr+zNMXTUyAXLVokFW5PC1KdnqqKMI3a0
> GkhTU/STmqSXrSFEsop+COnE0gaQsxbSSE3GM8w8oFbqO7KkmBM0NCzx8kkAwX6T
> vr6SEbcomAE8kvXe8b//x+3eNJzmB7otcKvvcJYPhKiUwYy/BDZiKz0qYnGmNaFh
> /q1U4+ER46k> =qZpj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> -- Paul Gettle, #970 of 1000 (RunnerPaul@*****.com)
> PGP Fingerprint, Key ID:0x48F3AACD (RSA 1024, created 98/06/26)
> C260 94B3 6722 6A25 63F8 0690 9EA2 3344
>
>
>




David Hinkley
dhinkley@***.org

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.