Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Hinkley dhinkley@***.org
Subject: Smart Guns/Smart Ammo
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 03:24:08 -0800
From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.carl.org>
Subject: Re: Smart Guns/Smart Ammo
To: shadowrn@*********.org
Date sent: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 06:55:14 -0700 (MST)
Send reply to: shadowrn@*********.org

> Some comments on the APDS thread regarding smartguns and variable ammo
> types sparked an idea.
>
> Take a revolver (6 rnds/cy), smartgun it, and load different ammo types in
> the cylinder (say three standard rounds, two APDS rounds, and a gell round).
> In combat you can spend a free action to rotate the cylinder to the round
> you want.
>
> Can you imagine the look on the PC/NPC's face when you follow up a gel
> round, that bounces right off their armor, with an APDS round? <EGMG>

Yes I can. But more important it establishs a rational reason to pick one
weapon over another. One roleplaying drawback of quantifing weapon
performance stats into a game system is that you either end up with a lot of
weapons that are alike in game stats or you get one clear "best" weapon.
Neither portrays real life. People's choice of a particular gun over another
are based on a wide variety factors some logical some not. I once met some
one who did not like Smith and Wessens because the cylinder turned the
wrong way and others picked a gun because it felt right in their hand. And
then there is the question of which is better 9mm or .45ACP, I have one
opinion and I know that there are others on the list that disagree. But this real
life aspect is missing from most all role playing game systems and with it a bit
of variety and color.


David Hinkley
dhinkley@***.org

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.