Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Rand Ratinac docwagon@*******.com
Subject: Q?: Mist form - Ghouls - Decking
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:25:40 PST
>-----BlackAdder Adds-----
<Snipples(TM)>
> Bioware might slip by this, but only that grown from cultured
>cells taken from the host, modified, then placed back in the person's
>body. '2nd hand' generic bioware would have a higher chance of being
>rejected by the vampire's new body, as it's largely allowed to remain
>in the body partly by numerous immunosupressents.
>
> These are just a few thoughts off the top of my head, since I'm
>in a hurry.
>
>Victor

Well, yes and no.

ALL Bioware is ABSORBED into the body in cases like this. What happens,
I think, is kinda like this...

*Regenerative antibodies (or whatever) are putzing along through the
body. "Dum de dum de dum." They bump into cyber. "Wait a minute. What's
this? It shouldn't be here." The antibodies try to chow down, but - it's
metal and plastic, so they can't deal with in. So they decide to push it
out of the body. After all, they can regenerate any damage caused by the
rejection, can't they?

The antibodies continue to putz along and find some bioware.
"Mmmm...living tissue. But...it's wrong. This piece of tissue should
look like this, not like that. Let's regenerate it so it's right." So
the regeneration antibodies/power/whatever reconfigures the bioware
until it's right - i.e. until it is exactly the way God'n'nature meant
it to be.*

Simplistic, I know, but I think that's the logic behind it. Cyber can't
be 'regenerated' into living tissue, but bioware can. So cyber is
rejected and bioware is absorbed.

*Doc' concentrates hard, attempting to regenerate his left leg into a
four foot long penis. "Useless thing!"*

Doc'
(aka Mr. Freaky Big, Super-Dynamic Troll of Tomorrow)

.sig Sauer

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.