Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ryan W. Bolduan emeottrw@***.umn.edu
Subject: Bug City Question
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:12:37 -0600 (CST)
> "And now, a Channel 6 editorial reply to Ryan W. Bolduan."
> ] Does anybody here have any good tables/resources for running a Bug City
> ] campaign? Everybody in my group is being transported there as soon as my
> ] game hits the day before the blast (they're in March right now), and I am
> ] trying to prepare for a free-flowing bug city campaign. In other words, I
> ] want to set it up so even I don't neccisary know what will happen every
> ] day. It all depends on the players themselves. Any suggestions?
>
> Maybe work out a whole bunch of plotlines in advance, or at least
> the starting points, and then when it seems like the characters are
> stumbling nicely towards one of your adventure ideas, work it out
> in more detail.
> Frankly, I've always hated the idea of Random Encounters. They
> drive me absolutely...well, buggy. If you do do a random encounter
> thing, make sure to make very little of it combat oriented...Bug
> City is a bad, bad place, and trouncing the characters every four
> steps will make you pretty unpopular.
>

I agree, random encounters are not my cup of tea either. If you want to
think of these as "random" that's okay, but I was thinking more along the
lines of no specific "shadowruns." I will have a couple of possible major
developments, but I was thinking more along the lines of table with random
people you meet, possible hooks into bigger adventures I can then write
out. I would drive it myself, but for Chicago I really want to get away
from that. I want the group to run the system, telling me what they want
to do, given small specifics that I introduce. After they have ideas of
where they want to go, I can flech them out.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.