Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth gurth@******.nl
Subject: APDS and Smartlinks
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 12:11:02 +0100
According to Sven De Herdt, at 12:55 on 26 Feb 99, the word on
the street was...

> 2. I think it is crap that you have to compare the UNMODIFIED power of
> a weapon with the armor rating. This means that a HMG won't penetrate
> the armor, but a sniper would? This sounded a bit illogical to me,
> especially if you consider the caliber of the HMG or am I mistaken in
> this one?

This is a problem with SR's weapon damages, which make reasonable sense
except for a few weapons -- heavy pistols, sniper rifles, and machine guns
being the main offenders. In my game the damages are somewhat changed:

Heavy Pistol: subtract 3 from the listed Power Level
Sniper Rifle: subtract 4
HMG: add 2

That means most sniper rifles end up at 10S, heavy pistols at 6M (7M for
the Super Warhawk), and so on.

This solution might not alter your real problem with SR's armor rules
(which appears to be that firing a lot of rounds won't have more effect
than firing a single one) but it does at least solve the problem that a
weapon which IRL penetrates armor better doesn't do so in SR.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"The only mechanoids ever issued with genetalia were those serving
aboard Italian starships" --Kryten, Red Dwarf VIII
-> NERPS Project Leader * ShadowRN GridSec * Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
->The Plastic Warriors Page: http://shadowrun.html.com/plasticwarriors/<-
-> The New Character Mortuary: http://www.electricferret.com/mortuary/ <-

GC3.1: GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+
PE Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
Incubated into the First Church of the Sqooshy Ball, 21-05-1998

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.