Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: A Halliwell u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk
Subject: Chips vs. French fries, etc.
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:41:52 +0000 (GMT)
And verily, did David Hinkley hastily scribble thusly...
|
|
|
|> >> > P.S. CONGRATULATIONS!
|> >> > You called em CRISPS! (which is what they are)
|> >> > I'll never understand the american need to call a crisp a 'chip',
|> >and a chip
|> >> > a 'french fry'...
|
|Oh the sweet mysteries of language....like whe anyone would call an elevator
|a lift or the cargo compartment of a car the boot rather then the trunk.........:)

Or the engine compartment lid, the 'bonnet'?
:)

But then, there's the old parkway / driveway thing.
The Pavement vs Sidewalk thing.

|As to inovative and tasty American foods what about?
|
|Fried Chicken
|Corn on the Cob
|The Ice Cream Cone

Oh good grief... Not trying to claim THAT one now, are you?
The Ice Cream Cone is a WESTERN thing. NOT purely american.

|Coca-Cola
|Bar-B-Que

I think the aussies will have something to say about the baaaaahby...

|Grilled Steak

????? Steaks have been around longer than the USA.
You're not SERIOUSLY saying that you were the first people to ever GRILL
them, are you?

:)

|The Hot Dog

Ahhhh, well... I think we can let you keep that little tube of congealed
fat.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| Finalist in:- |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ o+ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ |
|5++ X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! :( |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.